 | 
|
| |
|
Titel: Skiktröntgen undersöker hjärtat på några sekunder (serie: Tema hjärtat i bild) 2008 nr 43 sid 3043-6
|
Referenser:
1. Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. RadioGraphics. 2004;24:787-800.
2. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: How we do it- Data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:
1402-1412.
3. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, et al. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: Assessment of crosssectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:345-350.
4. Aviram G, Finkelstein A, Herz I, et al. Clinical value of 16-slice multi-detector CT compared to invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7:21-28.
5. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1978-1986. Comment in: Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1942-1944.
6. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Hall PA, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography: agreement of multi-slice spiral computed tomography and selective catheter angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Dec;20(6):549-52.
7. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive
coronary using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 Aug 2;46(3):552-557.
8. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):1482-7.
9. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F. van Mieghem C.A et al., High-resolution spiral computed
tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary
angiography. Circulation 2005 Oct 11:112(15): 2318-2323.
10. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb1;97(3):343-8.
11. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R et al, Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary
angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control.
Eur Radiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):2739-47.
12. Gilbert L. Raff and James A. Goldstein ,Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography:
Coronary Imaging Evolves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49 (18):1830-1833.
13. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, et al. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass
surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology. 2003;229:749-756.
14. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency
by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2004;110:3234-3238.
15. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass
grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1224-1249.
16. Mollet NR, Hoye A, Lemos PA, et al. Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic
coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:240-243.
17. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: In vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:830-835
18. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al, Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison With Invasive Coronary Angiography. J Amer Coll Cardiol 2007;49(9):951-959.
19. Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam A, Dabdoob W, Al Binali H, Suwaidi JA. Contrast enhanced 64-
slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive quantitative coronary angiography in coronary artery stent assessment. Radiology (in print).
20. M. Gilard, J. Cornily and P. Pennec et al., Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in
the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47: 2020-2024.
21. Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD; Milena J. Henzlova, MD, PhD; Sanjay Rajagopalan, MD Estimating Risk of Cancer Associated With Radiation Exposure From 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography JAMA. 2007;298:317-323.
22. http://www.rsna.org/Publications/rsnanews/oct07/upload/RSNANews_Oct07_MS_CardiacCT.pdf
23. R.C. Thompson and S.J. Cullom, Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear
and radiography procedures, J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:19-23.
24. D.R. Coles, M. Smail and I. Negus et al.,Comparison of radiation doses from multislice
computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1840-1845.
25. http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/cardiovascular/feature/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202200867
26. http://www.dimag.com/cardiovascular/feature/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197700574
27. Schmidt, Taly Gilat ; Star-Lack, Josh ; Bennett, N. Robert ; Mazin, Samuel R. ; Solomon, Edward G. ; Fahrig, Rebecca ; Pelc, Norbert. A prototype table-top inverse-geometry volumetric CT system. J. Med Phys 2006;33(6):1867-1878
28. R.C. Hendel, C.M. Kramer and M.R. Patel et al., ACCF/ACCR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/ SIR appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-1497
29. James A. Goldstein, Michael J. Gallagher, William W. O'Neill, Michael A. Ross, Brian J. O'Neil and Gilbert L. Raff. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;49;863-871;
 3043 |
 3044 |
 3045 |
 3046 |