Författare: Fugelli Per
Titel: Tillit är medicinens grundämne (serie: Tema allmänmedicin) 2006 nr 24 sid 1961-4
Ämnesord:
Allmänmedicin
Läkare-patientrelationer
Läkarens roll
Tro
Allmänläkare
Sök liknande artiklar (ny funktion på försök)
Referenser:
1.Greene G. The ministry of fear. London: Heinemann, 1973.
2.Seligman AB. The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
3.Luhmann N. Trust and power. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
4.Løgstrup KE. Den etiske fordring. København: Gyldendal, 1975.
5.Coleman JS, Fararo TJ, eds. Rational choice theory: advocacy and critique. Newbury Park: Sage, 1992.
6.Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA 1996; 275: 1693-97.
7.Irvine D. The doctors' tale. Professionalism and public trust. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2003.
8.Haug C. Mistillitens pris. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2005; 125: 273.
9.Mechanic D. Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust. Milbank Quart 1996; 74: 171-89.
10.Emanuel EJ, Neveloff Dubler N. Preserving the physician-patient realtionship in the era of managed care. JAMA 1995; 273: 323-29.
11.Grimen H. Tillit og makt - tre samanhangar. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2001; 121: 3617-9.
12.Pearson SD, Raeke LH. Patient's trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 509-13.
13.Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA 1998; 280: 1708-14.
14.Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. J Fam Pract 1997; 44: 169-76.
15.Thom DH, Bloch DA, Segal ES. An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. Acad Med 1999; 74: 195-98.
16.Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gate keeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA 1999; 282: 261-66.
17.Shortell SM, Waters TM, Clarke KWB, Budetti PP. Physicians as double agents. Maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities. JAMA 1998; 280: 1102-08.
18.Loewy EH. Justice, society, physicians and ethics committees: incorporating ideas of justice into the patient care decisions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 1996; 5: 559-569.
19.Westin S. The market is a strange creature: family medicine meeting the challenges of the changing political and socioeconomic structure. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 394-401.
20.Hall M A, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Quarterly 2001; 79: 613-39.
21.Johansen A. Talerens troverdighet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2002.
22.Syse A, Førde R, Førde OH, red. Medisinske feil. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2000.
23.Fugelli P. The Patient Europe - calling for the general practitioner. Eur J Gen Pract 1996; 2: 26-29.
24.McGormick J. Death of the personal doctor. Lancet 1996; 348: 667-68.
25.McWhinney IR. The importance of being different. Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 433-36.
26.Heath I. The mystery of general practice. London: The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1995.
27.Aarnes A, Bjørnstad H. Ut av fatning. Oslo: Aschehoug, 2001.
28.Skrabanek P. The death of humane medicine and the rise of coercive healthism. Suffolk: Crowley Esmonde, 1994.
29. Fugelli P. 0.visjonen. Essays om helse og frihet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2003.
30.Fugelli P. General practice in the megazone. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 12-16.
31. Maynard A, Bloor K. Trust and performance management in the medical marketplace. J Roy Soc Med 2003; 96: 532-9.
32.Fugelli P, Heath I. The nature of general practice. Yes to traditional values must mean no to fundholding and managerial ambitions. BMJ 1996; 312: 456-57.
Format för användning i referenslista:
Fugelli P. Tillit är medicinens grundämne. Läkartidningen 2006;103:1961-4.
